After seven days–full of exploration–the DOC Talk series finally came to an end on November 9, 2024. The last session of DOC Talk brought funding as the main topic, where Does It Matter Who Funds? was the title of the talk show. It was a discussion about funding programs that have increasingly moved massively in Indonesia over the last 15 years, especially in the realm of empowerment, social, and culture. In its course, funding can serve as a catalyst that reinforces the steps toward prominent and sustainable goals. However, how effective is this scheme in creating a sustained support cycle within an interconnected ecosystem? This current DOC Talk was presented to answer these concerns, inviting participants from various backgrounds and demographics to dive into the challenges and opportunities. Guided by Tunggal Pawestri, Yayasan Humanis (Humanist Foundation) Executive Director, together with Kurnia Yudha F., IDOCLAB 2024 Program Director, and moderated by Suluh Pamuji, the discussions flowed through diverse thoughts, enriched our knowledge, and woven the hopes for a sustainable future of art and culture.
It is undeniable that amid the development of various cultural initiatives and social empowerment, the reality shows that there is a decrease in funding for the arts and culture sector. This phenomenon raises an important question: How can we ensure sustainability if we rely deeply on limited funding flows? According to Tunggal, who often supports filmmakers and other social initiator, as a funding institution, they also faced financial challenges. “As an institution, we also need money,” he said. But, is it really just money that we need? Are there other needs that are often forgotten?
The answer is not definitely just about money. Funds are important, but other important things are mentors, who can provide direction, good quality of facilities and tools to support the production, and even opportunities to build a reputation. These are other supporting factors––that might be needed––to support the success of a project. Then, where exactly can this funding be obtained from? Does the source have to be similar to another, or can it be flexible? In terms of funding, the options available are more diverse than something under our noses. Some potential sources, which can be options, include bilateral and multilateral partners, philanthropic organizations–both national and international, local and international non-governmental organizations (NGOs)–CSR from companies, religion-based institutions, high-income individuals, and crowdfunding involving many participants.
Tunggal then shared some strategies to gain support from these sources, starting with a solid plan. The first step is to thoroughly re-examine the fundraising strategy: set clear fundraising goals or design a business strategy, identify potential donors (by conducting research or donor intelligence), and build a well-organized database. Next, re-evaluate any ideas or activities that require funding, and don’t hesitate to make adjustments if needed.
There are several models for seeking funding, either through calls for proposals, formal requests for pitching, or individual submissions. However, one thing that has to be kept in mind is that funders don’t want to just be seen as the “ATM machines”. We must build good relationships, build mutual trust, and maintain warm relationships. Strong relationships between benefactors and beneficiaries of funds are not only about transactional relationships but also collaboration, trust, and sustainability that provide long-term benefits. With this approach, funding is not only a fund but a force to sustain the continuity and sustainability of the initiatives we build together.
After that, a question-and-answer session began, and several participants expressed their opinions, which were then addressed by Tunggal and Kurnia with their personal experience stories. Some participants inquired about what happened after the work was completed and the funds were received. They also wondered about the preferred criteria of funders––whether they interfered in the aesthetics of the work or film that would be made by the beneficiaries of the funds. Tunggul and Kurnia said that it really depends on each funder. However, so far funders have preferred works that align with the values of the institution.
By sharing experiences and opening up constructive discussion, DOC Talk has provided important insights into funding and sustainability in the arts and culture scope. We hope that through this conversation, more and more people will be inspired to create ecosystems that support the growth and development of works of art.
Covered byTirza Kanya on November 9, 2024. (Ed. Vanis/Trans. Shafira Rahmasari)
