{"id":1061,"date":"2018-11-01T19:21:34","date_gmt":"2018-11-01T12:21:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ffd.or.id\/site\/uncategorized\/interview-with-hore-besok-libur-the-team-behind-ojek-lusi\/"},"modified":"2018-11-01T19:21:34","modified_gmt":"2018-11-01T12:21:34","slug":"interview-with-hore-besok-libur-the-team-behind-ojek-lusi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ffd.or.id\/en\/interview-en\/interview-with-hore-besok-libur-the-team-behind-ojek-lusi\/","title":{"rendered":"Interview with Hore Besok Libur, The Team behind \u2018Ojek Lusi\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Ojek Lusi invited the audience to remember the disaster of Lumpur Sidoarjo (Lusi) through the victim\u2019s life. After 11 years and never resolved, the disaster that drowned 16 villages is finally developed to \u201ctourism\u201d site and encouraging new professions by people there, one of them is ojek driver doubled as tour guide.<\/p>\n<p>Publicist Team of Festival Film Dokumenter 16 has interviewed the team of Hore Besok Libur as the production team of Ojek Lusi, one of the nominator of Short Documentary Competition FFD 16. They are Winner Wijaya (Director), Antonious Wilson (Producer), and Cornelius Kernia (Script Writer\/Sound)<\/p>\n<p><strong>What makes you raised Lumpur Sidoarjo as the main topic of the film? Is there any personal story?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>AW: the first idea of the film came from me. I visited there before and found tourism site instead. The victims become tour guide and there\u2019s so much story on how they lost their home. Even, someone sell dvd about the tragedy. This is unique yet strange.<\/p>\n<p>WW: I think They experiences ironic tragedy. They are victims, whose house is drowned in the mud for a long time already, but they changed the tragedy as their source to keep alive; becoming tour guide.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Ojek Lusi already received so much appreciation from several festivals and screening event. How do you think about it? Is there any personal approach in majority of the audience?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>WW: honestly i didn\u2019t understand how this happened. But, maybe because this film is not exploiting the victims\u2019 sadness. Instead, Ojek Lusi showed another side of the victim\u2019s life which is not different with us all. This is that i think succeed in building audience\u2019s empathy because the victims treated as human being, not as the subject who cried over and over again.<\/p>\n<p>AW: this film guided the audience\u2019s mood like riding a roller coaster. In many times, we invited them to laugh happily. But, there are times when we were trying to remind the audience that the subject in this film is victims of a tragedy, and they has already adapted to the situation. And the way they adapted is actually not good. They forced to be adapted with the condition because they should tell their suffering to different people everyday.<\/p>\n<p><strong>This year FFD raised Post-Truth as the main theme of the Festival. The idea presented to introduce people how documentary is involved in spreading its version of truth related to a phenomenon. What do you think about it and where is the position of Truth that \u201cOjek Lusi\u201d had in between the information about Lumpur Sidoarjo?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>CK: actually, we can say that this film is having a comparison. In the research stage, we found \u201cMud Max,\u201d a film with same setting.. but, we didn\u2019t want to make our film look like that. They film was too focused on the natural condition and showing the pathetic side of the tragedy. In today\u2019s condition, that is nothing. So that, we then\u00a0 make different version of it. Besides, they\u2019ve already adapted, utilizing whatever exist to make life and actually enjoying their life. They go through as it is.<\/p>\n<p>AW: Ojek lusi came as additional information of the forgotten tragedy. This film invited the audience to remember again the tragedy that is still not resolved yet even after years. How can we? Through the story told bt the victims who live their life in unique way.<\/p>\n<p>WW: Many of films and information about Lumpur Sidoarjo is ordered by the media. They have their own interests. There\u2019s so many filters. Fortunately, we didn\u2019t take the same path. We lived with the victims, sleep there, and made the film as what we experienced there in the producing process.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Do this film ever screened in front of the victim? Considering that they are the subject of this film? Or maybe Sidoarjo People in general?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>WW: Unfortunately, we\u2019ve yet to screen the film to them. That\u2019s actually our debt towards them.<\/p>\n<p>AW: The plan faced so much obstacles, especially we are still college students with so much assignments to do. As we planned, after the final project next semester, we will come back there and will be screened the film in front of them.<\/p>\n<p>CK: We even considering to give the copy of the film to them as a token for them. After that, its up to them to treat the film in the future.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Can you tell us about your experience as the part of Festival Film Dokumenter 2017?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>WW: This is our first time to be here. So far, we are happy with everything in here. As established festival, FFD be able to present good-planned screening climate compared to other festival we\u2019ve attended.<\/p>\n<p>CK: We hope the festival will be keep going. Don\u2019t even think to stop. And hopefully it will becoming bigger and bigger as its years of implementation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ojek Lusi invited the audience to remember the disaster of Lumpur Sidoarjo (Lusi) through the victim\u2019s life. After 11 years and never resolved, the disaster that drowned 16 villages is finally developed to \u201ctourism\u201d site and encouraging new professions by people there, one of them is ojek driver doubled as tour guide. Publicist Team of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":363,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[],"edition":[62],"class_list":["post-1061","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-interview-en","edition-ffd-2017-en"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ffd.or.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1061","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ffd.or.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ffd.or.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ffd.or.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ffd.or.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1061"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ffd.or.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1061\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ffd.or.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/363"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ffd.or.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1061"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ffd.or.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1061"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ffd.or.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1061"},{"taxonomy":"edition","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ffd.or.id\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/edition?post=1061"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}